Archive for the ‘Carbon Tracking’ Category

Hara, Software Solution to Manage & Track Natural Resources

Thursday, June 4th, 2009

hara.png

Hara has developed a corporate application that can track natural resource inputs-fossil fuels, water, electricity, industrial chemicals, mercury, fuel consumed in travel-and waste products and then provide recommendations to optimize operations, according to CEO Amit Chatterjee. The primary target customers will be municipalities, large energy consumers, and companies with extensive supply chain networks.

From Greentech Media:

Coca-Cola has tested out the software in over 12 locations and is now “in the process of full deployment,” he said. It’s a somewhat unusual victory: it can often take years to land a name account in enterprise software.

The city of Palo Alto has also been using the software. It expects to save $2.2 million in energy and $400,000 in waste and wastewater treatment costs annually. The software effectively paid for itself in three months. Kleiner, Perkins put $6 million into the company.

The software in many ways seemed targeted at tying together various loose ends in the green software market. A raft of companies have released dashboards in the past few years that track direct and indirect emissions or carbon credits while others have examined output from alternative energy sources.

The idea behind Hara is to give a comprehensive view of the “organizational metabolism,” Chatterjee said. If a company is mostly concerned about reducing energy costs, or water consumption, the remedial recommendations will be skewed toward the desired result or a blend of goals.

Share with the World:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Netvibes
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt

RouteRank: Selecting Transportation Options Based on CO2 Emissions

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

I just came across a new website called routeRANK, which ranks a route based on transit mode (car, rail, or air), price, time and carbon dioxide emissions. It’s currently only offered in Europe (which makes good sense because train transit is a viable option to compete with short flights).

Here’s a routeRANK screenshot of Madrid to Barcelona in Spain sorted by price (the default)–click on the picture to get a higher resolution:

routerank.png

Here’s the same route, sorted by CO2 emissions–click on the picture to get a higher resolution:

routerank2.png

Notice that train travel is by far the most sustainable form of travel according to routeRANK, by nearly an order of magnitude over comparable flight options. I wonder how many people would be persuaded to take a slower, but more environmentally friendly route based on this information? Another pertinent question is, how accurate are these CO2 emission estimates? According to the routeRANK website:

CO2 emission calculations are based on a model developed by the IFEU Heidelberg. They are further refined using information from the European Commission, non-profit organizations, transport providers and universities across Europe.

The calculations account for emissions generated by transport vehicles (e.g., gasoline and diesel from the vehicle’s tank), emissions generated by the extraction and conversion of energy (e.g., crude oil, coal, uranium from power plants or refineries), and emissions generated by energy distribution (e.g., tank trucks, power grid, oil tankers). They do not include emissions generated by construction, maintenance and disposal of transport vehicles (e.g., cars, planes, trains) or infrastructure (e.g., roads, airports, railway lines).

Car emissions are based on those of a mid-sized, gasoline-powered passenger car (EURO 4) with an average of 1.5 passengers. Plane emissions account for differences in capacity utilization where data is available. Similarly, train emissions account for differences in capacity utilization and consider national differences in electricity mix.

Users can customize their car by choosing the fuel type (petrol or diesel) and car type (small, medium, large, or custom car). The custom car option lets the user enter the exact fuel consumption of the car, which will then be used in the calculations.

Want to know even more?
We can provide you with a detailed sheet of CO2 calculations for the different forms of transport. Please contact us to receive this information or with any further questions you may have.

On a slightly unrelated note, when I was interning with John Krumm at Microsoft Research back in 2007, we brainstormed a research project that would rank driving routes based not just on time (i.e., the most efficient) but also on safety (e.g., reroute around dangerous intersections). In the future, I imagine such information being readily-at-hand to help us make more informed travel decisions.

Share with the World:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Netvibes
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt

San Francisco Schools Pilot Program: Mobile Carbon Tracker

Monday, March 16th, 2009

radio3-22_cellphones300.jpg

KQED recently did a story on a pilot program in San Francisco where high school students are given Nokia cell phones to test a mobile carbon tracking system.

The way the San Francisco pilot program works is like this: students get a mobile phone equipped with a GPS maps application. They fill out a profile with the make and model of the cars they use. The cell phone monitors movement, so it picks up when that student is making a car trip. The server factors in the time of day, the weather and humidity, and the type of car the student is riding in – and then calculates the amount of carbon output that trip represents.

The program currently doesn’t differentiate between cars and other forms of transportation – bikes, ferries, trains, carpools, buses – so students may need to note when those trips were not regular car trips. The final number is their carbon rating.

When the program expands to three other San Francisco schools at the end of March 2009, a competition will be formed between the high schools to see which group of 25 students can cut back the most on their car trips and carbon output.

That will help answer the question of how much pollution people can save just by altering transportation behavior. And hopefully, the participants here are young enough that those transportation choices might continue after the program has ended. Once they get used to walking or biking, for instance, maybe they’ll make that a regular form of transportation.

Note that this is similar to the UbiGreen Mobile Transportation display; however, in that project we did not use GPS instead opting for a sensing platform that was capable of inferring walking, running, and bicycling in addition to driving in a vehicle.

Share with the World:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Netvibes
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt

New iPhone Carbon Tracking App: Clear Standards’ Carbon Tracker

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

carbontracker.png

carbontracker2.png

In what is likely to be the first of many iPhone applications that use the built-in GPS to assist with carbon calculations, Clear Standards has released a free iPhone app called “Carbon Tracker.” As I don’t have an iPhone, I cannot evaluate this application directly but I will offer a few thoughts.

First, as previously mentioned on this blog, the iPhone does not allow applications to run in the background. Thus, I would speculate that in the case of this “Carbon Tracker” application, the user would have to explicitly launch it and have it running as the top level application in order to automatically log trips via GPS. As a result of this constraint, the GPS functionality will likely be underutilized. Not to mention the set of technical challenges relating to how the GPS data is cleansed and segmented into trips as well as user tolerance for inaccurately deduced travel estimations. See my paper with John Krumm on automatically converting car GPS data to the more semantically meaningful “trip” here (specifically, the section entitled “From GPS Data to Trips”).

Second, because the “auto-trip” functionality will likely be undermined by the iPhone’s background process restriction, users will have manually log their trip data in order to produce accurate carbon counting information. In my opinion, a user would have to be extremely motivated to open “Carbon Tracker” and enter such comprehensive trip data.

Finally, what incentives outside of a personal commitment to reducing carbon emissions does one have to use this application? What sort of user will be motivated to maintain accurate records for an indefinite amount of time–would even the most sensitive environmentalist use this application once the novelty wore off replaced by the tedium of manually entering such data? My guess is that Clear Standards has an enterprise version of this application which could rely on corporate policies to enforce usage (e.g., for record keeping purposes). This seems to be supported (and implied) by Richard Mendis, co-founder of Clear Standards:

Although Clear Standards is known for developing carbon management software for businesses, we recognize the important role of individuals in helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions… The Carbon Tracker iPhone app…engages individuals as part of our overall carbon management and sustainability solutions.

See also related posts:

Share with the World:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Netvibes
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt